View IRS2540_2930597.PDF datasheet online --- IC-ON-LINE

Datasheet File OCR Text:

1 www.irf.com irplled1 irplled1 high voltage led driver using the IRS2540 table of contents page 1. introduction????????????????????????...?.1 2. constant curr ent cont rol.......................................................................3 3. frequency se lection..............................................................................6 4. output l 1 and c out select ion ................................................................6 5. fet vs. diode for t he low-side switch.?????????????.12 6. v cc supply ...?????????????????.???????.15 7. v bs supply ??????????????????.???????.16 8. enable pin ???.??????????.????????????.17 9. other design cons iderations .?????.????????????.23 10. design procedure summary ???.??????????????.24 11. bill of materials ?????????..????????????.24-26 12. pcb layout ????????????????????????...26
2 rd-0608 www.irf.com 1. introduction as the industry becomes more power conscious to co mpensate for increasing energy costs and to meet governmental regulations, new innovative ways of conserving energy are being developed. for the lighting industry one of these outlets has been le ds. due to their longevity, robust design, low maintenance and high efficiency, they have proven to be a viable alternative to less efficient light sources. with their long term projected falling cost and further increased effi ciency, the industry has eagerly embraced leds and put them in high de mand. leds require drivers that have specific features such as constant current control over the temperature and manufacturing variations of leds, dimming, and appropriate fault protections. the irs254(0,1) is specifically designed to address these requirements the irplled1 evaluation board is a high voltage le d driver designed to operate on an input dc voltage of 40 v to 170 v and supply a programmable load current of 350 ma, 700 ma, 1 a, or 1.5 a. the output voltage is also clamped at 30 v by the external open-cir cuit-protection circuitry, which can easily be disabled or reconfigure as explained in this reference design. however the output voltage should not exceed the ratings of the external components mounted on the board; higher voltage when optimized components are utilized in the design. irplled1 uses the irs254(0,1), a high voltage, high frequency buck control ic for constant led current regulation. the irs254(0,1) controls the average load current by a continuous mode time-delayed hysteretic method using an accurate on chip band gap voltage reference. the 8-pin, 200 v (600 v) rated IRS2540 (irs2541) inherently provides short-circuit protection, with open-circuit protection incorporated by a simple external circuit and has full dimming capabilities. the irs254(0,1) allows scalable designs to accommodate series and parallel configurations of leds, for today?s production leds as well as new generation higher current leds, and provides high current control accuracy over input and output voltage. the evaluation board documentation will briefly describe the functionality of irs254(0,1), discuss the selection of the output stage, of the switching components, and of the surrounding circuitry. this board was tested with a single lumileds? flood board for the 350 ma and 700 ma settings, and two lumileds flood boards in parallel for the 1 a and 1.5 a settings. lumileds flood boards are available through future electronics and have a max nominal current rating of 700 ma with a breakdown voltage between 16 v and 24 v. this demo board can operate off of a 120 v ac rectified line with the addition of a proper rectifying circuit.
3 rd-0608 www.irf.com 2. constant current control the irs254(0,1) is a time-delayed hysteretic buck controller. during normal operating conditions the output current is regulated via the ifb pin voltage, nominal value of 500 mv. this feedback is compared to an internal high precision band gap vo ltage reference. an on-board dv/dt filter has also been used to prevent erroneous transitioning. once the supply to the chip reaches v ccuv+ , the lo output is held high and the ho output is low for a predetermined period of time. this initiates the charging of the bootstrap capacitor, establishing the v bs floating supply for the high-side output. then the chip begins toggling ho and lo outputs as needed to regulate the current. the deadtime of approximately 140 ns between the lo and ho gate drive signals prevents ?shoot-through? and reduce switching losses, particularly at higher frequencies. 1 2 3 4 8 7 6 5 vcc ifb lo vs ho vb com m1 m2 cboot dboot rcs rf cf rs1 cvcc1 cvcc2 rov1 rov2 cen dov den1 l1 en com vbus cout rg1 rg2 vout + vout - ic1 cbus2 rs2 dclamp cbus1 l2 enn rout fig. 1: irs254(0,1) constant curre nt led driver typical schematic (see fig. 16 for evaluati on board schematic) note: r out is needed only in few applications under normal operating conditions, if v ifb is below v ifbth , ho is on and the load is receiving current from v bus . this simultaneously stores energy in the output stage, l 1 and c out , whilst v ifb begins to increase. once v ifb crosses v ifbth , ho switches off after the delay t ho,off . once ho is off, lo will turn on after the deadtime, the inductor and output capacitor releas e the stored energy into the load and v ifb starts decreasing. when v ifb crosses v ifbth again, lo switches off after the delay t lo,off and ho switches on after the delay t ho,on .
4 rd-0608 www.irf.com fig. 3: irs254(0,1) control signals, i avg =1.2 a t_lo_on t_ho_off dt1 ifbth 50% 50% 50% 50% t_lo_off dt2 t_ho_on ho lo ifb 50% fig. 4: irs254(0,1) time delayed hysteresis (a) (b) fig. 2: (a) storing energy in inductor (b) releasing stored inductor energy
5 rd-0608 www.irf.com the switching continues to regulate the current at an average value determined as follows: when the output combination of l 1 and c out is large enough to maintain a low ripple on i fb (approximately less than 100 mv), i out(avg) can be calculated: rcs vifbth avg iout = ) ( having load current programmable from 350 ma to 1.5 a, series and parallel combinations of resistors must be used to properly set the current, as we ll as distribute power accordingly. equivalent resistances for each current setting were calculated as follows: ? = = 43 . 1 350 5 . 0 350 ma v r ma ? = = 71 . 0 700 5 . 0 700 ma v r ma ? = = 5 . 0 1 5 . 0 1 a v r a ? = = 33 . 0 5 . 1 5 . 0 5 . 1 a v r a since some of these equivalent values of resistance are not available, series and parallel combinations are used, and they are specified as follows (all combinations use standard value resistors: 1.43 ? , 0.56 ? , and 0.47 ? ): ? = ma r ? = ? ? ? = 715 . 0 ) 43 . 1 || 43 . 1 ( 71 . 0 700 ma r ? = ? + ? ? + ? ? = 515 . 0 ) 56 . 0 47 . 0 ( || ) 56 . 0 47 . 0 ( 5 . 0 1 a r ? = ? + ? ? + ? ? + ? ? = 343 . 0 ) 56 . 0 47 . 0 ( || ) 56 . 0 47 . 0 ( || ) 56 . 0 47 . 0 ( 33 . 0 5 . 1 a r although some of the series and parallel combinations do not yield the exact re sistance needed, for all tolerance purposes, they are accura te enough. for this evaluation board, an extremely tight current regulation was achieved with a worst case result of 1.2% for the 350 ma setting as the bus voltage was swept from 40 v to 170 v. likewise a precise regulation of 0.25% was maintained for a varying load voltage from 16 v to 24 v for the 350 ma current setting.
6 rd-0608 www.irf.com 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 30 80 130 180 v in (v) i out (ma) 350ma 700ma 1a 1.5a fig. 5: v out = 16 v, l 1 = 470 h, c out = 33 f 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 10 15 20 25 30 v out (v) i out (ma) 350ma 700ma 1a 1.5a fig. 6: v bus = 100 v, l 1 = 470 h, c out = 33 f 3. frequency selection the frequency in the irs254(0,1) is free running and maintains current regulation by quickly adapting to changes in input and output voltages. there is no need for additional external components to set the frequency as seen with most oscillators, resulting in a part reduction. the frequency is determined by l 1 and c out , as well as the input/output voltages and load current. the selection of the frequency will be a trade-off between system efficiency, current control regulation, size, and cost. the higher the frequency, the smaller and lower the cost of l 1 and c out , the higher the ripple, the higher the fet switching losses, whic h becomes the driving factor as v bus increases to higher voltages, the higher the component stresses and the harder it is to control the output current. with an input voltage as high as 170 v, the targeted frequency was determined to be between 50 khz and 75 khz. within this operating spectrum all components can easily handle their associated power losses. 0.6% 0.5% 1.2% 0.3% 0.25% 0.13% 0.17% 0.1%
7 rd-0608 www.irf.com 4. output l 1 and c out selection to maintain tight hysteretic current regulation l 1 and c out need to be large enough to maintain the supply to the load during t ho,on and avoid significant undershooting of the load current, which in turn causes the average current to fa ll below the desired value. first, we are going to look at th e effect of the inductor when there is no output capacitor to clearly demonstrate the impact of the inductor . in this case, the load current is identical to the inductor current. figure 7 shows how the inductor value impacts the frequency over a range of input voltages. as can be seen, the input voltage has a great impact on the frequency and the inductor value has the greatest impact at reducing the frequency for smaller input voltages. figure 8 shows how the variation in load current increases over a span of input voltage, as the inductance is decreased. figure 9 shows the variation of frequency over different output voltages and different inductance values. finally fig. 10 shows ho w the load current variation increases with lower inductance over a rang e of output voltages. 175 225 275 325 375 30 80 130 180 v in (v) frequency (khz) 470uh 680uh 1mh 1.5mh fig. 7: i out = 350 ma, v out = 16.8 v, c out = 0 f the output capacitor can be used simultaneously to achieve the target frequency and current control accuracy. figure 11 show s how the capacitance redu ces the frequency over a range of input voltage. a small capacitance of 4.7 f has a large effect on reducing the frequency. figure 12 shows how the current regulation is also improved with the output ca pacitance. there is a point at which continuing to add capacitance no longer has a significant effect on the operating frequency or current regulation, as can be seen in figs. 12 & 13.
8 rd-0608 www.irf.com 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 30 80 130 180 v in (v) i out (ma ) 470uh 680uh 1mh 1.5mh fig. 8: i out = 350 ma, v out = 16.8 v, c out = 0 f 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 13 18 23 28 33 v out (v) frequency (khz) 470uh 680uh 1mh 1.5mh fig. 9: i out = 350 ma, v in = 50 v, c out = 0 f 325 327 329 331 333 335 337 339 341 343 345 13 18 23 28 33 v out (v) i out (ma ) 470uh 680uh 1mh 1.5mh fig. 10: i out = 350 ma, v in = 50 v, c out = 0 f
9 rd-0608 www.irf.com 10 100 1000 30 80 130 180 v in (v) frequency (khz) 0uf 4.7uf 10uf 22uf 33uf 47uf fig. 11: i out = 350 ma, v out = 16.8 v, l = 470 h 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 v in (v) i out (ma) 0uf 4.7uf 10uf 22uf 33uf 47uf fig. 12: i out = 350 ma, v out = 16.8 v, l = 470 h 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 1020304050 capacitance (f) frequency (khz) 40v 100v 160v fig. 13: i out = 350 ma, v out = 16.8 v, l = 470 h
10 rd-0608 www.irf.com the addition of the c out is essentially increasing the amount of energy that can be stored in the output stage, which also means it can supply current for an increased period of time. therefore by slowing down the di/dt transients in the load, the frequency is effectively decreased. with the c out capacitor, the inductor current is no longer identical to that seen in the load. the inductor current will still have a perfectly triangular shape, where as the load will see the same basic trend in the current, but all sharp corners will be ro unded with all peaks significantly reduced, as can be seen in figs. 14 & 13. fig. 14: i out = 350 ma, v in = 100 v, v out = 16.85 v, l = 470 h, c out = 33 f fig. 15: i out = 350 ma, v in = 100 v, v out = 16.85 v, l = 470 h, c out = 33 f
11 rd-0608 www.irf.com l 1 and c out need to be chosen so that it stores enough energy to supply the load during t ho,on while maintaining current control accuracy. a lower value of l 1 will require a larger value of c out . since this evaluation board is designed to handle a load current only as high as 1.5 a, off the shelf inductors are available. instead, to minimize or eliminate any effects of eddy currents, a custom inductor for this application was designed by vogt. high value (in the order of 1 mh or more) inductors that can handle this amount of current are not readily available and tend to be bulky and costly. with too small of an inductor (in the order of 100 h or less), the c out capacitor would need to be in the order of hundreds of micro farads to maintain good current regulation. additionally, with a smaller inductance, the ripple current seen by the capacitor would be quite large, shortening the life of the capacitor, if an electrolytic were used. because of these considerations an inductor of 470 h and an output capacitance of 33 f were chosen to accommodate the 1.5 a load current. the current ripple associated with 470 h is relatively small, so the board can be operated with or without output capacitance at the lower current ratings. 5. fet vs. diode for the low-side switch the irs254(0,1) has been designed so that it can drive a low-side fet and a high-side fet. if the use of two fets for the half-bridge pr oves to be a cost issue, the lo w-side fet can be replaced by a freewheeling diode as shown in fig. 16. of course this may yield a lower cost system, but there are some efficiency tradeoffs to be cons idered, particularly for higher load currents. the system efficiency is directly influenced by several system paramete rs including operating fre quency, load current, and input voltage. a major parameter to consider is the reverse recovery time of the diode in comparison to the body diode of the fet it replaces. the diod e intrinsically has a much shorter reverse recovery time since the device is specifically designed for this, where as the body diode is a parasitic element that originates from basic processing technology and typically has inferior characteristics, in terms of forward drop, reverse recovery, and power handling capabilities. fig. 16: alternate irs254(0,1) time-delayed hy steretic controlled evaluation board schematic note: r out is needed only in few applications
12 rd-0608 www.irf.com the reverse recovery problem is incurred during the deadtime after the low-side fet has been on and conducting current. during this deadtime the low-side fet is off, but the body diode is freewheeling and providing current to the load. since the body diode is conducting current, carriers are present and will eventually need to be recombined, leading to reverse recovery. when the high-side fet turns on, the v s node is almost instantly pulled from com to v bus and the low-side fet or the freewheeling diode conducts current from v s to ground due to the reverse recovery effect, potentially resulting in large power losses, overheating of the low-side switching component and component stress, as can be seen in figs. 17 & 18. since the power diode has a much shorter reverse recovery time, the diode will conduct current for a significantly shorter period and have lower power losses. at lower frequency and lower load current, the long recovery time a ssociated with the fet body diode may not be an issue. for higher frequency higher current applications, a diode could provide lower power losses with respect to a fet. in the evaluation board, the reverse recovery current peaks using a low-side fet would be on the order of 8 a, which puts a lot of stress on the components, not to mention the increased operating temperature. by replacing the low-side fet with an appropriate freewheeling diode, the reverse recovery peaks can be reduced and limited to 4.5 a. the frequency was also se lected to keep the diode reverse recovery associ ated power losses low. with the inclusion of a freewh eeling diode instead of a low-si de fet there is a need for r s3 and d vcc . without an initial pulse to come from lo establishing a ground reference for c boot to charge, an alternate ground reference must be established. there are two paths that could potentially serve this role, one is through r s2 and the other is through the open-circuit components, r ov1 and r ov2 . the most versatile path is through r ov1 and r ov2 since there are no constraints along this path tied to the chip?s turn on threshold. by making these two resistors, that are already serving function to the circuit, a bit smaller, the capacitor now has a low resistive path for which to charge. r s3 allows this charging path to exist without any interference from the chip v cc , likewise d vcc also allows this path to remain isolated. as the bus voltage is increased, the path will allow c boot to fully charge and remain charged until the chip comes out of uvlo. at which time the self powering feature will take over after the first pulse from ho, and the ground reference will then be created by the freewheeling diode. fig. 17: using a low-side fet, v in = 100 v, i out = 1.5 a, v out = 17 v
13 rd-0608 www.irf.com fig. 18: using a diode on the low-side, v in = 100 v, i out = 1.5 a, v out = 17 v fig. 19: low-side fet vs. low-side diode comparison, v in = 100 v, i out = 1.5 a, v out = 17 v the bus voltage is also of importance since it will determine how long the low-side fet, or the freewheeling diode will be conducting. if the bus volta ge is very large in comparison to the output, the low-side fet or diode will be conducting for the majority of the switching period. a fet has much lower on-state losses due to the low r ds,on , where as high voltage diodes rarely have forward drops less than 1 v. if the load current is in the order of 1 a or 1.5a, a fet may have low on-state losses, where as the diode may experience larger conduction losse s. if the load current is only a few hundred milliamps, the losses observed in the diode may not be a concern, and the cost savings of a diode could be exercised. for system efficien cy, the forward conduction losses of a diode can also be compared to the reverse recovery losses with a low-side fet. for this eval uation board, it was found that conduction losses were less than reverse recovery losses when running at 1.5 a and therefore uses and freewheeling diode.
14 rd-0608 www.irf.com fig. 20: low-side fet and low-side diode comparison, v in = 100 v, i out = 1.5 a, v out = 17 v the most efficient solution would be to put the fet in parallel with the diode in the low-side position. in this case, during the deadtime, instead of the body diode freewheeling, the additional diode would be conducting. this will always be the case as long as the forward drop of the external diode is less than that of the body diode. if costs permit, a diode in parallel with an igbt could also be an option. a detailed, evaluation of system needs and cost should be performed prior to choosing a fet or diode for the low-side. although a diode is cheaper, in certain cases the as sociated power losses may require a heatsink, nullifying the cost reduction of using a diode. likewise there are conditions where a fet may prove less efficient, in which case more money will be spent on the fet as well as the heatsink to keep it cool. the evaluation board is provided with a freewheeling diode and the footprint for a low- side fet has been provided to replace the diode with a fet if the application requires it. it is not recommended to replace the diode with a fet for the 1 a and 1.5 a operation because of the associated reverse recovery power losses. if replacing the diode with a fet is a requirement, it might be beneficial to move the diode heatsink to the high-side fet. in terms of choosing the correct fet, it is best to use a fet rated as low as possible considering what is needed in the application. fet parameters degrad e as the voltage ratings go up. therefore, if a 600 v fet is used in a 200 v application, extra losses may be incurred due to a component that far exceeds the requirements. if using two fets, the next parameter to be considered is the reverse recovery time. obviously fets will not have a re verse recovery time comparable to diodes, but a good fet reverse recovery time will be in the order of 150 ns to 200 ns. the two remaining parameters to consider are direct trade-offs of each other, on resistance and gate charge. if the fet has a rather low gate capacitance, the die size will be sm all, but this will result in a larger on resistance which could potentially be a problem for high current applications. on the other hand, if the fet has a large gate capacitance, the die will be large and the fet will have a low on resistance, but it will be more difficult to turn on the fet which will also stress the ic. there has to be a direct compromise between the two, typically the best solution is a fet with a relatively low r ds,on and a medium sized gate capacitance, much like the device chosen for this application 6. v cc supply since the IRS2540 (irs2541) is rated for 200 v (600 v), v bus can reach values of this magnitude. if only a supply resistor to v bus is used, it will experience high power losses. for higher voltage
15 rd-0608 www.irf.com applications an alternate v cc supply scheme utilizing a resistor feed-back (r s2 ) from the output needs to be implemented, as seen in figs. 1 & 16. the resistance between v bus and v cc (r s1 ) should be large enough to minimize the cu rrent sourced directly from the input voltage line; value should be on the order of several kilo ohms. through this supply resistor a current will flow to charge the v cc capacitor. once the capac itor is charged up to the v ccuv+ threshold, the irs254(0,1) begins to operate, activating the lo and ho outputs. after the first few cycles of switching, the resistor r s2 connected between the output and v cc will take over and source current for the ic. the r s2 resistor provided in the evaluation board has been designed for an output of roughly 20 v. if a higher output voltage is desired, r s2 will need to be redesigned and adjusted accordingly. a 10 f capacitor has been used for stabilizing v cc of the chip. such a large capacitance makes the chip immune to any large low frequency ripple that may be observed on v bus due to a rectified waveform. there are also other benefits associated with using such a large capacitance, of which will be discussed later. with having all input and output voltages defined for the evaluation board, enough information is provided to calculate values for r s1 , r s2 , and r s3 (see fig. 23 for component definition). all three supply resistors were chosen to be 1 w devices si nce they source a ll current to the chip. by making each component 1 w, the work in supplying the ch ip can be split up equally, making it a more robust solution, instead of baring the entire task on one component. doing this also allows the chip to turn on at a lower bus voltage. assuming that a 14 v external zener diode will be used on v cc , exact values of r s1 , r s2 , and r s3 were calculated as follows (values were calculated to operate the components just below half their rated power): r v p 2 = r s1 ( ) 1 14 2 1 2 max rs v v w bus ? = () ( ) w v v w v v r bus s 2 1 14 170 2 1 14 2 2 1 max ? = ? = ? ? = k k r s 56 6 . 48 1
16 rd-0608 www.irf.com r s3 % 10 ratio duty min ( ) ( ) 3 2 14 1 . 0 1 2 1 max s bus r v v w ? ? ? = () () ()( ) w v v w v v r bus s 2 1 14 170 1 . 0 1 2 1 14 1 . 0 1 2 2 3 max ? ? ? = ? ? ? = ? ? = k k r s 47 8 . 43 1 r s2 ( ) 2 2 14 2 1 max s out r v v w ? = () () w v v w v v r out s 2 1 14 30 2 1 14 2 2 2 max ? = ? = ? ? = k r s 1 512 1 7. v bs supply the bootstrap diode (d boot ) and supply capacitor (c boot ) comprise the supply voltage for the high- side driver circuitry. to guarant ee that the high-side supply is char ged up before operation commences, the first pulse from the output drivers comes from the lo pin. during undervoltage lock-out mode, the high- and low-side outputs are both held low. during an open-circuit condition, without the watch dog timer, the ho output would remain high at all times and the charge stored in c boot would slowly leak until reaching zero, thus eliminating the floating power supply for the high-side driver. to maintain sufficient charge on c boot , a watchdog timer has been implemented. in the condition where v ifb remains below v ifbth , the ho output will be forced low roughly after 20 s and the lo output forced high. this toggling of the outputs will last for 1 s to maintain and replenish sufficient charge on c boot .
17 rd-0608 www.irf.com fig. 21: illustration of watchdog timer the bootstrap capacitor value needs to be chosen so th at it maintains sufficient charge for at least the 20 s interval until the watchdog timer allows the cap acitor to recharge. if the capacitor value is too small, the charge will fully dissipate in less than 20 s. the bootstrap capacitor should be at least 100 nf. a larger value within reason can be used if preferred. the bootstrap diode should be a fast recovery, if not an ultrafast recovery component to maintain good efficiency. since the cathode of the bootstrap diode will be switching between com and v bus + 14 v, the reverse recovery time of this diode is of critical importance. for additional information concerning the bootstrap components, refer to the design tip (dt 98-2), ?bootstrap component selection for control ics? at www.irf.com under design support. 8. enable pin the enable pin can be used for dimming and open-circuit protection. when the enn pin is held low, the chip remains in a fully functional state with no alterations to the operating environment. to disable the control feedback and regulation, a voltage greater than v enth (approximately 2.5 v) needs to be applied to the enn pin. with the chip in a disabled state, ho output will remain low, where as the lo output will remain high to prevent v s from floating, in addition to maintaining charge on the bootstrap capacitor. the threshold for disabling the irs254(0,1) has been set to 2.5 v to enhance immunity to any externally generated noise, or application ground noise. this 2.5 v threshold also makes it ideal to receive a drive signal from a local microcontroller. dimming mode to achieve dimming, a signal with co nstant frequency and set duty cycl e can be fed into the en pin. there is a direct linear relationship between the aver age load current and duty cycle. if the ratio is 50%, 50% of the maximum set light output will be rea lized. likewise if the ratio is 30%, 70% of the maximum set light output will be realized. a suffic iently high frequency of the dimming signal must be chosen to avoid flashing or ?strobe light? effect. a signal on the order of a few khz should be sufficient. for this evaluation board, a fully adjustable (0% to 100% duty cycle) pwm wave generator has been designed but not included in the layout. the following design is a recommended enable signal generator.
18 rd-0608 www.irf.com 1 2 3 4 8 7 6 5 out1 gnd in1(+) in2(+) in2(-) out2 vcc in1(-) lm393 pot1 cvcc3 cvcc4 den2 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 c1 c2 com vbus ic2 rs2 out to enn pin fig. 22: suggested pwm driver (not included in irplled1) if an external supply for v cc is used, the minimum amount of dimming achievable (light output approaches 0%) will be determined by the ?on? time of the ho output, when in a fully functional regulating state. to maintain reliable dimming, it is recommended to keep the ?off? time of the enable signal at least 10 times that of the ho ?on? time. for example, if the application is running at 75 khz with an input voltage of 100 v and an output voltage of 20 v, the ho ?on? time will be 3.3 s (one- fourth of the period ? see calculations below) according to standard buck topology theory. this will set the minimum ?off? time of the enable signal to 33 s. % 20 100 * 100 20 100 = = ? = v v v v cycle duty in out s khz ho on 3 . 3 75 1 * % 20 time = = if the chip is supplied from the output, a large enough capacitor on v cc is required to maintain sufficient current while in a disabled state. for this evaluation board, where the ic supply comes from the output, a 10 f capacitor is used to ensure continued proper operation while disabled, the output is capable of dimming down to roughly 10 v. a ?strobe light? effect in the leds may be observed if v cc drops too much or if the dimming frequency is too low.
19 rd-0608 www.irf.com enable duty cycle relationship to light output 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 102030405060708090100 percentage of light output enable pin duty cycle fig. 23: light output vs. enable pin duty cycle fig. 24: IRS2540 dimming signals since the irs254(0,1) does not include an onboard osc illator, a soft start feature is not possible. this is only a concern when operating in the dimming mode. since pwm dimming is required of leds, the output is essentially turning on and off at a ra te of the dimming frequency. in the absence of soft start, a large spike of current would be observed in the load each time the output is turned on. this current spike stresses the load po ssibly decreasing its overall lifet ime. the irplled1 includes a jumper setting to define whether or not the board is being used in the dimming mode. this two position jumper will allow the designer to either include or exclude the resistor r out , which is in series with the output capacitor. the inclusion of this resistor will sufficiently damp the output stage, such that output current spikes are significantly reduced or eliminated. the presen ce of such current spikes may cause the inductor to hum or buzz, the emitted sound will be that of the dimming frequency. the inrush of current causes mechanical movement in the inductor which can be heard if the pwm signal is within the audible range of the hum an ear. the effects of adding in r out can be seen in figs. 25 ? 28.
20 rd-0608 www.irf.com fig. 25: load current spike excluding r out i out = 350 ma, v in = 100 v, v out = 17 v fig. 26: load current ripple excluding r out i out = 350 ma, v in = 100 v, v out = 17 v although the inclusion of the resistor will minimize or eliminate the load current spikes, the overall current regulation and operating frequency will be sli ghtly compromised. the resistor will reduce the overall effectiveness of the output capacitor whic h means the switching frequency will marginally increase. likewise the output ripple current will also increase, which ultimately leads to a larger current regulation tolerance. although the overa ll current regulation capabilities may decrease with the inclusion of this resistor, the actual stability of the pwm dimming signal will still be the dominant factor of the overall output current regulation capabilities.
21 rd-0608 www.irf.com fig. 27: load current spike including r out (5 ? ) i out = 350 ma, v in = 100 v, v out = 17 v fig. 28: load current ripple including r out (5 ? ) i out = 350 ma, v in = 100 v, v out = 17 v open-circuit protection mode by using the suggested voltage divider, capacitor, and zener diode, the designer can virtually clamp the output voltage at any desired value. if there is no load and the output clamp is not utilized, the positive output terminal will float at the high-side input voltage. the open load clamp is recommended if the load is disconnected and then r econnected without shutting down the driver. when the load is reconnected with power on, the load would see the entire bus voltage for a short period of time. the
22 rd-0608 www.irf.com open-circuit clamp minimizes the amount of stress seen by the load under such circumstances by clamping the voltage much lower than v bus . IRS2540 fig. 29: open-circuit protection scheme in open-circuit condition, switching will still occur between the ho and lo outputs, whether due to the output voltage clamp or to the watchdog timer. in this state, rather than regulating the current with the feedback pin, the output voltage will be loosel y regulated via the enable pin. transients and switching will be observed at the positive output terminal as seen in fig. 30. the difference in signal shape, between the output voltage and the i fb , is due to the capacitor c en used to form the voltage clamp. the repetition of the spikes can be reduc ed by simply increasing the cap size. if v bus is significantly larger than the desired output voltage clamp, the output voltage will become a function of v bus . this is because of the in trinsic delays of the chip (t lo,on , t lo,off , t ho,on , and t ho,off ) along with the minimum ho on time. if the load is removed, the output will clamp at the desired voltage. then if the bus voltage is increased, there could be a proportional change in the clamped voltage. this is not seen as an issue since the open-circuit clamp is strictly a safety feature to reduce th e stress seen by the load, if disconnected and reconn ected without a power down. fig. 30: open-circuit fault signals, with clamp
23 rd-0608 www.irf.com the two resistors r ov1 and r ov2 form a voltage divider for the output, which is then fed into the cathode of the zener diode d ov . the diode will only conduct, flooding the enable pin, when its nominal voltage is exceeded. the chip will enter a disabled state once the divider network produces a voltage at least 2.5 v greater than the zener rating. the capacitor c en serves only to filter and slow the transients/switching at the positive output terminal. the clamped output voltage can be determined by the following analysis. ( ) ( ) 2 2 1 5 . 2 r r r dz v v out + + = voltage rated nominal diode zener = dz d ov has been chosen to be a 7.5 v zener diode. r ov2 has also been set to 390 ? to help provide a low resistive charging path for c boot as previously discussed. it was also decided to clamp the output voltage at 30 v, this is sufficiently larger than the predefined maximum load voltage of 24 v as to not cause any erroneous shut-down, while it is also well within the specifications of the 100 v rated output stage. having arbitrarily chosen these parameters, r ov1 was calculated as follows: ( ) ( ) 2 2 1 5 . 2 ov ov ov out r r r dz v v + + = () () ? = ? ? + ? ? = ? + = 780 390 5 . 7 5 . 2 390 30 5 . 2 2 2 1 v v v r dz v r v r ov ov out ov ? ov r 9. other design considerations filtering the rc filter on the ifb pin is only used to remove high frequency transients associated with the fet switching. the corner frequency of this filter was le ft high enough to prevent any further distortion of the feedback. the input filter is a low-pass filter. its main objec tive is to prevent ringing of comparable frequency on v bus . exact values of capacitance and inductance are not of critical importance, so long as filtering is accomplished. in addition to the electrolytic that is used for filteri ng on the bus, there is also a small ceramic for high frequency signals. ceramic capacito rs typically have low esr such that they are more ideal for high frequency filtering. v cc filtering was accomplished by typical means of using a small 100 nf ceramic, an additional electrolytic was used in case of dimming. the larg er electrolytic was placed in event a long enable signal is given. with this larger capacitance, the v cc supply will remain for a prolonged period of time so the outputs will remain disabled, and the chip will not shut down.
24 rd-0608 www.irf.com the enn filter capacitor was arbitrarily chosen to be 100 nf, this helps slow the rate of switching during open load conditions. the irs254(0,1) was specifically designed to handle low frequency ripples on v bus . its capability to handle such ripple makes it ideal for an offline rectified waveform. however if high voltage (on the order of 5 v to 10 v) high frequency oscillations (gr eater than or close to the operating frequency) are present on v bus , it is recommended to implement an input f ilter. if these high frequency signals are present on v bus the irs254(0,1) will still continue to regulate the current through the load, but abnormal switching of lo and ho may be observed. this poses a problem in terms of switching losses. as previously discussed, one may need or want to control the operating frequency to control the systems efficiency, but if lo and ho randomly switch, it may negate all attempts to control the frequency. of course the root of this problem can be significantly contributed through pcb layout, but it is also a function of the load current. if filters on i fb and v cc are not placed correctly these high frequency ripples will couple to the chip and appear with in the control loop. also if the load current is on the order of 1 a or 1.5 a, when ho turns on, the load immediately tries to pull the rated current. since the circuit supply is not usually close by, the capacitance of the input wire is not enough to compensate for this large pull of current, this will result in oscillations or change in potential on the input line. since the switching element of the circu it is one cause of these oscillations, it is easy to see how likely the presence of high frequency oscillations are. to alleviate the circuit of such possible problems, it is much easier to implement an input filter. the input filter will also greatly improve the circuits emc performance. emc performance the irs254(0,1) demo board has not been emc tested. input and output filters can be used to reduce the conducted emissions to below the limits of the applicable emc standard as needed. all inductors may require a powdered iron core rather than fe rrite, it can handle a much larger current before saturating, needs are pending on the load current. if emc is of critical importance, one may prefer to use one fet and one diode, in contrast to a half-bri dge driver. the reverse recovery time for a diode is inherently shorter than that of a fet. this will help in reducing transients observed in the switching elements resulting in better emc performance. layout considerations it is very important when laying out the pcb for the irs254(0,1) to consider the following points: 1. c vcc2 and c f must be as close to the ic as possible. 2. the feedback path should be kept to a minimum without crossing any high frequency lines. 3. c out should be as close to the main inductor as possible. 4. all traces that form the nodes v s and v b should be kept as short as possible. 5. all signal and power grounds sh ould be kept isolated from each other to prevent noise from entering the control environment. it?s a general rule of thumb that all components associated with the ic should be connected to the ic ground with the shortest path possible. 6. all traces carrying the load current need to be adjusted accordingly. 7. gate drive traces should also be kept to a minimum. 10. design procedure summary 1. determine the systems requirements: input/output voltage and current needed 2. calculate current sense resistor 3. determine the operating frequency required 4. select l 1 and c out so that they maintain supply into the load during t ho,on .
25 rd-0608 www.irf.com 5. select switching components (fet/freewheeling diode) to minimize power losses 6. determine v cc and v bs supply components 7. add filtering on the input, i fb and enn as needed 8. fine tune components to achieve desired system performance 11. bill of materials careful selection of the components will signifi cantly increase the reliab ility of the product, particularly for the capacitors. these need to be rated for at least 100 oc and a proper voltage. as in most electronic power applications, capacitors and re sistors are the components most likely to fail due to stress over time and high operating temperatur es. all capacitors connected to the output in this evaluation board have only a rating of 100 v. these capacitors may also need to be changed if the load is significantly differe nt from the tested load.
26 rd-0608 www.irf.com item device type description part # manufacurer # of devices reference 1 c 10uf, 25v, radial uvz1e100mdd nichicon 1 cvcc1 2 c 100nf, 200v, 1812 vj1812y104kxcat bc components 1 cbus2 3 c 100nf, 50v, 0805 vj0805y104kxatw1bc bc components 3 cvcc2, cboot, cen 4 c 33uf, 100v uvz2a330mpd nichicon 1 cout 5 c 1nf, 50v, 0805 vj0805y102kxacw1bc bc components 1 cf 6 c 47uf, 200v uvz2d470mhd nichicon 1 cbus1 7 d 200v, 1a mur120t3 on semi 1 dboot 8 d mini melf ll4148 diodes inc 2 den1, dvcc 9 d 300v, 8a 8eth03 ir 1 d1 10 dz 14v, 0.5w, mini melf zmm5244b-7 diodes inc 1 dclamp 11 dz 7.5v, 0.5w, mini melf zmm5236b-7 diodes inc 1 dov 12 l 470uh il 050 321 31 01 vogt 1 l1 13 l 470uh rfb1010-471 coilcraft 1 l2 14 r 10ohm, 1%, 0805 mcr10ezhf10r0 rohm 1 rg1 15 r 0.56ohm, 1%, 1206 erj-8rqfr56v panasonic 3 rcs2, rcs4, rcs6 16 r 0.47ohm, 1%, 1206 erj-8rqfr47v panasonic 3 rcs1, rcs3, rcs5 17 r 1.43ohm, 1%, 1206 9c12063a1r 43fghft yageo 2 rcs7, rcs8 18 r 100ohm, 1%, 0805 mcr10ezhf1000 rohm 1 rf 19 r 390ohm, 5%, 1/2w, 2010 erj12zyj391 panasonic 1 rov2 20 r 820ohm, 5%, 1/2w, 2010 erj12zyj821 panasonic 1 rov1 21 r 1k, 5%, 1w 5073nw1k000j12afx phoenix passive 1 rs2 22 r 47k, 5%, 1w 5073nw47k00j12afx phoenix passive 1 rs3 23 r 56k, 5%, 1w 5073nw56k00j12afx phoenix passive 1 rs1 24 r 5ohm, 5%, 1w 5073nw5r100j12afx phoenix passive 1 rout 25 ic IRS2540/1 IRS2540/1 ir 1 in socket 26 socket 8 pin dip 2-641260-1 amp 1 ic1 27 m 200v, 16a, to-220 irfb17n20d ir 1 m1 28 t pc compact, red 5005 keystone 2 t1, t4 29 t pc compact, black 5006 keystone 2 t2, t5 30 t pc compact, yellow 5009 keystone 1 t3 31 h heatsink 7-340-1pp-ba ierc 1 32 b pcb 1 33 j jumper, 10 pos. 929836-09-05-nd 3m 1 jset 34 j jumper, 2 pos. 929836-09-02-nd 3m 1 jdim 35 sj shorting jumper 929950-00-nd 3m 3 36 d not fitted difb 37 r not fitted rifb 38 m not fitted m2 39 th to-220 insulating thermal p sp600-54 berquist 2 40 w shoulder washer 3049 berquist 2 41 sc screw, 4-40, 0.5", zinc h346-nd building fasteners 1 42 n nut, 4-40, hex, zinc h216-nd building fasteners 1
27 rd-0608 www.irf.com enable signal generator (not included) item device type description part # manufacurer # of devices reference 1 c 10uf, 25v, radial ecea1ekg100 panasonic 1 cvcc3 2 c 100nf, 50v, 0805 vj0805y104kxatw1bc bc components 1 cvcc4 3 c 1nf, 50v, 0805 vj0805y102kxacw1bc bc components 2 c1, c2 4 d mini melf ll4148 diodes inc 1 den2 5 r 1k, 1%, 0805 mrc10ezhf1001 rohm 1 r6 6 r 6.8k, 1%, 0805 mrc10ezhf6801 rohm 1 r5 7 r 10k, 1%, 0805 mrc10ezhf1002 rohm 1 r4 8 r 20k mrc10ezhf2002 rohm 1 r2 9 r 75k mrc10ezhf7502 rohm 2 r1, r3 10 r 100k mrc10ezhf1003 rohm 2 rs2 11 pot 10k, 10-turn m64w103kb40 bc components 1 pot1 12 ic comparator lm393d texas instruments 1 in socket 13 socket 8 pin dip 2-641260-1 amp tyco electronics 1ic2 12. pcb layout top overlay top metal
28 rd-0608 www.irf.com bottom overlay bottom metal ir world headquarters: 233 kansas st., el segundo, california 90245 tel: (310) 252-7105 data and specifications subject to change without notice. 9/8/2006

▲Up To Search▲

Price & Availability of IRS2540

	To Download IRS2540 Datasheet File
If you can't view the Datasheet, Please click here to try to view without PDF Reader .